This town is toast. From an old timers local perspective we have come to another turning point in our history. We have thrown in the towel so many times that we have run out of towels. Park City, It still doesn’t suck. Is that enough? Is that what we want.
The major historical inflection points for this ski town are
important to note. The first was when
the John F. Kennedy Presidential administration gave us a few million dollars
to jumpstart the ski industry in town in the early sixties and the Park City
ski resort was formed. The second was
when Deer Valley Ski Resort came on line in the early eighties bringing style,
class and customer service to the local lexicon. The third was the expansion of upper Deer
Valley in the early nineties, valiantly protested by the Citizens for
Responsible Growth but ultimately settled for more than 1000 more units added
to the already 2000 units approved for the resort. Then came the Olympic games in the early 2000
where we welcomed the world here and put Park City on the map as a major
international destination resort. After
that came the American Ski Corporation expansion of The Canyons master plan of
several thousand units. Finally Vail
came to town and tried to take over our name while offering cheap season
passes, limiting backcountry access and installing avalanche fences above
trophy homes.
In between we suffer from an almost imperceptible
incremental lifestyle entropy where every day there is another condo or resort, another
traffic light, another annual festival or event added to our sleepy little home
town. Its like boiling frogs, where we
hardly notice that it is getting hotter or more crowded. We offer up some protest during the process,
occasionally show some regulatory spine but often buy out unsightly
developments at extortion prices in back room deals among the players.
Now we come to
another turning point in our history.
Both Park City and Deer Valley are on the fast track to eliminate their
day skier parking lots to build larger resort centers with commercial and
residential components and there is no doubt that Vail will eventually replace
their lower parking lot with some kitschy Bavarian Village replica
development. Parking replacement will be
minimal and only for residents or those who can pay the price. This might not be a bad idea to help utilize
our busses and satellite lots and keep traffic out of town, if the developer
would contribute some of their millions in parking lot savings and profits to the
cause. And this is not to mention the
creation of the Mayflower Resort, Hideout Expansion, Sliver Creek Village or
Industrial Park zoning change just to mention a few.
In the past we used to imagine that we could limit development with water supply but if you have money in the west, you have water. Some of us remember the days of dry tanks, water main blow outs, rationing and water moratoriums but we threw a lot of money and expertise at that and solved that problem by regionalization and pumping most of our water from over on the Weber river. Then we thought traffic would be the limiting factor because you can’t buy your way out of a traffic jam. While it is reprehensible to the locals what has become of our streets, new people don’t think it is that bad compared to where they came from.
We used to contemplate the public good and the human welfare
when considering projects and problems and evaluating real cost/benefits for
all, not just the chosen few who get to make the big deals and the
decisions. I get that this state and country
are now more concerned with personal property rights and individual freedoms
more than the common good but this town has always been better than that. We are a community that cared about our town
and each other more than the almighty dollar.
Most of us came here for the ‘quality of life’ thing and not to get
rich. We don’t want to kill the goose
that lays the golden egg but mostly we don’t want to lose our tight little town
where everyone knows your name and says hello.
So it is a matter of perspective for us who remember how
this town used to be and our dreams for what it might become. We used to say we didn’t want to be another
Aspen with their empty trophy homes, expensive restaurants, and fur shops, but
have we just become another Vail with its car and condo culture, long lift
lines and impersonal developments? This
may be the last time for the old timers to stand up and say enough is enough,
before we cash in on our million dollar homes and slink off defeated with our
tails between our legs to Mexico or Arizona or Maine, because this town is
toast. Or is it?
In a way, we laid the seeds for our own doom. We found this special little end-of-canyon ('85 for me) and brought with us our nominal artifacts of quality life: an espresso machine, four-wheel drive, Internet dial-up, fat tire bikes. We quietly touted our "Treasure Hollow" to outside folks (though we were originally all outside folks ourselves). We projected joy, and pride, and stewardship and little wonder that the world took notice. New arrivals came with their fat skis and full-suspension bikes and bottomless portfolios. They saw investment potential and an ethic of monetizing everything. I suspect that it is an unavoidable Darwinian effect. I've seen it in Hinesburg, Vermont, Nelson, B.C, and Namche, Nepal. A few adventurous souls go forth in search of the unsullied, private place. It remains pure, quaint, and pastoral until the word gets out (often broadcast from our own mouths and handwriting) and the secret is unsealed. My personal takeaway is that all things are transient. Paradise is a fleeting moment; childhood is brief. We all got to enjoy the moment and take it for what it is. Impermanent. But the greater heartbreak is that the money interests have caught on to the larger trend and are prospecting the new next best place to exploit even before it can enjoy its brief era of private, quiet pleasure.
ReplyDeletePark City is not a high elevation ski resort and the climate change impact will be felt sooner than later
ReplyDelete